|
Challenging Contextualism
Penny Lewis, Stephen Spear
£20
Paperback 120 pages (21 Mar, 2003)
Publisher: Gordon Murray & Alan Dunlop Architects (gm+ad architects)
ISBN: 1903653150
Order Challenging Contextualism Today

book review by adrian welch
31.03.03
A sumptuous hardback cover makes a great start, and its warm autumnal
colours carry into the book. Subtle use of the '+' (from gm+ad architects),
ingeniously frame photos, reinforcing the idea of creative unison. gm+ad
is so much more suitable to the practice direction than the full title
still much used: Gordon + Alan should insist on it!
The subtitle 'Challenging contextualism' cannot go unnoticed: we see a
setting-up of an antithesis to Scotland's contextual Modernism which Deyan
Sudjic recently wrote about and which is popular amongst a large amount
of architects with a strong media profile. This is a bold move and suggests
from the outset that the book will contain theory, a stance other than
simply product profile.
We're not let down, first by Professor Steven Spier's introduction, then
Penny Lewis' text, but I want to hear more about the issue of 'reduced
to the maximum': this phrase is used to back up the work, and some
does resonate with this maxim. However, I would like to know how the bow
of Spectrum's chicken wing and the huge cantilevers of Bewleys and A3
fit with this. They are seen by some as indeed having 'redundancy in
construction or meaning' and gm+ad could have used this opportunity
to explain their purpose - simply energising the profile or more? They
are bold flourishes that draw attention and perhaps should simply be viewed
as such.
gm+ad architects' work is described as being brash: it could also be described
as being punk architecture, the SAS (Radisson Hotel) wing for example
is subversive to Glasgow's grid, to the regular underpinning of the city
both metaphorically and physically. Opinions will diverge on whether the
buildings excite or annoy but all must see that they energise our cities
and profession. Similarily, the mention of negagement - 'writing letters'
- is important: Scottish architecture can be terribly somnabulant
and conservative.
The reference to breaking the grid coupled with 'waning interest in
historical or urban context' implies a defying of what-is-expected,
not for anti-historical reasons but for sheer practicality, examples being
given such as orientation. The partners are not 'joined at the hip' so
some level of divergence in dealing with various contexts should be expected.
I sense a snowballing of enthusiasm: contrast even the not-so-old - A3's
slate wing is greyish, almost subtle and literally grounded - and the
new - Radisson Hotel Glasgow's copper
wing is of vibrant hue, angled in four planes, massively punctured, irreverent
to the city grid and floats agilely. Both wings are devices and both create
new language which I have no doubt will be quoted by the next generation
of Scottish architects if not before. The growing confidence must surely
also be in part due to better Clients and with greater opportunities.
The rippling facade of Bewleys Hotel Glasgow
exudes energy from every protrudance, controversial in Scotland maybe,
but when compared with a similar rippling facade - Gunther Dominig's bank
in Graz - it's a mere pussycat. The 'interference' in an already semi-corrupted
Bath Street is a valid point of debate, but thank God someone is defining
an agenda that really stretches the range of what is possible and
permissible in Scottish architecture.
A recurring theme of gm+ad's work is this idea of lightweight envelopes
sliding between solid planes, and of wafer-thin foils that are dependant
on proficient detailing. The wings of SAS or Bewleys wouldn't work if
they were thicker or edged in a clumsy way. Beyond the blunt shock is
a subtle rhythm and counterpoint - Bewleys' lower and upper canopies form
cohesive 'start' and 'end' to the staccato 'body'. Having stayed at Bewleys
it is indeed sad that gm+ad didn't get to work the interior as they wished
and this doesn't help the impression of some that the architecture is
too showy and externally weighted.
Spectrum similarly has a rhythm in the pillowed, highly-polished stainless
steel, random square apertures to the stair core's north elevation and
varying bold colours behind the stridently regular grid of louvres. All
combine to create poetry of reflected weather, and, with the polished
solid black granite base, reflected city - cars, lights, you, me. Apart
from these rather abstract and painterly qualities, the less talked about
facades are very clean: witness Spectrum's smooth south facade and the
lack of weep holes, fans, overflows and the like in SAS' pristine internal
facades.
Gordon and Alan's practice biography joins Richard Murphy Architects'
and Terry Farrell & Partners': all of a sudden we have architects' practices
in Scotland explaining their process and product in a sophisticated way.
This reflects a confidence in Scottish architecture and should encourage
more to do the same. The fact that the likes of Jonathan Glancey have
made it up to Glasgow to review the SAS suggest gm+ad's work has reached
new levels of maturity: they certainly don't lack confidence.
Order gm+ad
architects book : Challenging Contextulaism
Historic Glasgow
Glasgow buildings
Scottish
Architecture: best scottish buildings of the last three decades
Scottish
Architects
Glasgow walking tours
Glasgow : back to index
gm+ad architects book
: Curious Rationalism 2006
gm+ad architects
|